Truth About IB

All you need to know about the International Baccalaureate Programme (but were afraid to ask)

Home

About Us

Press

PETITION

Breaking News & Opinions

IB in the Media

IB Math Fraud

News archives

IB + Earth Charter

Obama/Duncan/IB

Is IB Superior?

What's the Difference?

IB vs AP

IB MYP and PYP

IB vs A-Levels

You learned WHAT?!?

IB Unraveled

The IB Hidden Curriculum

IB and The Earth Charter

IB and UNESCO

Mother Earth Day

Sample IB Lessons

Sample IB Exam Questions

IB TOK Curriculum

TAIB vs. TOK Canada

IB student letters/TOK

IB Reading Lists

IB History of Americas

How Much Does IB Cost?

IB Fees

Actual IB Budgets

How Are IB Exams Graded?

Blog of a TOK Examiner

IB and Special Ed

Does IB Take Control?

IB Application Process

IB Schedule Requirements

IB Ownership

IB Dispute Resolution

IB Buyers Beware!

IB Playbook

IB Action Awards

IB Triangle of Travesty

IB in Norcross, GA

IB in Springdale, AR

IB in Monticello, NY

IB in Coeur d'Alene, ID

IB in Incline Village, NV

Incline Task Force Minute

IB in Mesa, AZ

IB in Bastrop, Texas

IB Locust Valley, NY

IB Bow, NH

IB Cherry Hill, NJ

IB in Fairfax, VA

IB in Upper St. Clair, PA

A Tale of Two Cities

Dear IB,

What Can I Do?

Is IB a Cult?

KFAB Radio Interviews

IB You Tube videos

Pro-IB Comments

Free Brochures

Forum

Redefining Rigorous

Contact Us

IB Theory of Knowledge

IB's Theory of Knowledge course, hereafter referred to as TOK, is a mandatory component of the IB Diploma Program. Before the details of this "philosophy" course are explored, it is important to know that authorized IB schools are required to make scheduling of the Diploma Program central to operations and that the TOK course MUST be offered, even if there are fewer full Diploma students than a Board of Education's minimum class size policy dictate. Proponents of IB have argued that a school may open TOK classes to non-Diploma students. While this is true, what IBO doesn't tell you is that the school is not only required to establish an internal assessment committee to review the students' final papers as IB's external assessors are prohibited from doing so but also that non-DP students who take the course will not be recognized for it on an IB transcript.

Click HERE for IBO's overview of TOK:

According to the IBO website, "IB puts everything in perspective".  But WHOSE perspective? That is the question. Delivered from the perspective of secular humanists, is it fair to ask minors to put aside religious and family values and rely solely upon the opinions of philosophical atheists such as Neitszche and Kant to determine what correct knowledge is?

Click HERE for the "prescribed titles" of the questions for THIS YEAR'S (08-09) Diploma Candidates (so those of you who want to get a jump on the essay can begin now).

Click HERE for some sample essays from TOK.

Particularly disturbing, is the student who chose to address their essay on abortion.

"To impose a law defining a fetus as a "person," granting it rights equal to or superior to a woman's - a thinking, feeling, conscious human being -- is arrogant and absurd. It only serves to diminish women. Nobody has the right to impose their laws on others."

Does IB truly believe that this represents "higher critical thinking skills"? A blatant brandishing of insult and dismissal to the Pro-Life position held by millions?

Click here for TOK "song" and commentary:
http://www.last.fm/group/International+Baccalaureate/forum/24099/_/70597

Click HERE for moreTOK resources.



The philosophy of IB - one person's view from the inside

IBO is more ideological than educational. My concern lies in the fact that a single worldview is given to IBO teachers (all IBO teachers must attend conferences such as this) as necessary instruction in their respective IBO classes.

It is a shame when education in skills and thinking is replaced by the presentation of a single worldview. Indoctrination cannot,  in a society which truly aspires to individual liberty, be substituted for education.

"In authoritarian and totalitarian societies schools exist to indoctrinate students in the orthodoxy of the state. In a democracy, by contrast, we teach students how to think, not what to think. In other words, in a free society the very purpose of education is to open students’ minds and encourage future citizens to figure out what conclusions to draw by themselves. It is not the purpose of a democratic education to force-feed students opinions on controversial issues that the teacher deems ‘politically correct’."

In Mein Kampf, for instance, Adolf Hitler stressed "the importance of winning over and then training the youth in the service ‘of a new national state.’ 

The government school system would be the means to the end. 

"When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ he said in a speech on November 6, 1933, "I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already . . . What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.’" And on May 1, 1937, he declared, "This new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing."

The irony of values-based curriculum instruction is not wasted on this observer, for as a nation, we have spent the last sixty years trying get rid of the teaching of solely one set of values, attempting to clearly delineate, for example, the boundary between church and state.  Yet, under the guise of global citizenry, IBO now does the exact same thing, preaching a gospel of its own values, its own religion.

IBO operates with the stated goal to develop global citizens, taking stands on everything from environmentalism to international diplomacy to population control. 

At my training, in a subject as seemingly objective as Calculus, I was encouraged to fill my curriculum with word problems that demonstrate an underlying agenda for the program – declining animal populations, the dangers of pollutants, global warming, etc. 

IBO as a whole ascribes to the tenets of the Earth Charter, at one point even  giving its full endorsement to this political movement.

IBO also has strong ties to groups like the United Nations and several of its subsidiaries.

Thomas Jefferson noted, "To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." In other words, it is morally wrong, even "tyrannical" for a program such as IBO to be in the public school systems, paid for by those who fully disagree.

It is unethical for public education to support curriculum that promotes a single worldview to the exclusion of others. In order to be informed citizens, students must be taught to think analytically and logically, as opposed to merely parroting ideas. Therefore, I cannot, in good conscience, support the International Baccalaureate Organization, which favors the indoctrination of students at the taxpayer’s expense.

http://gilfordgrok.com/blog2/2009/03/the_philosophy_of_ib_one_perso.html

This web site is built and maintained by concerned citizens of the United States of America